(04/16/2008) Question 361:
...on a delayed blue card and i know not recomended but delayed yellow card, if the
team that was victim of the foul scores do they still get the powerplay? |
(04/13/2008) The Ref's Response:
If the Ref decides to indicate a delayed penalty, then the Ref must see an
advantage to the attacking team that should be played out. If the advantage
results in a goal scored, then the time assessed for the card would be in
accordance to the Rules of Indoor Soccer. So then the following time assess would result:
- If there is a player already in the box serving a Minor or
Double-Minor and the team is playing short, their current 2 minute time
would be relived.
- If the delayed penalty is for a Red Card offense, and the play can go on, then the team is serving a 5 minute with no relief.
- If the box is empty, then the offending player is relived of the first 2 minutes.
It may be wise to note your decission on the game sheet |
(04/12/2008) Question 360:
if a fan doesnt want to leave the field what does the referee do ?? |
(04/13/2008) The Ref's Response:
The conduct of the spectators are the TEAMS responsibility, not yours.
Assuming your actions described in Question 359 do not produce a
positive result, you make it clear to both coaches (ie. I suspect even
though you may think you know the team responsibly, you need to be
sure), preferably in a loud enough voice that the spectators hear as
well, that the game will not be restarted until the particular
spectator has left the park. In the very unlikely event neither
coach takes action, after the appropriate waiting period the game is
abandoned.
After the game is complete, it is important to submit a Misconduct Form
with your game report. If you are a member of the CDSRA, this was
near the top of the list from our Presisdent and the Referees Affairs
Committee.
|
(04/12/2008) Question 359:
if the fan started to swear at you do you go and kick them out or do you talk to
there coach?? |
(04/13/2008) The Ref's Response:
Quite often the spectators are not on the same side of the field as the
team. So talking to the coach is an option, and I'd say a good
one if the team is on the same side as the spectators, but may not be
as affective as the Ref talking to the spectator. However the Ref
should anticipate the reaction of the spectator (ie. is he/she just
caught up in the moment, or are they acting this way intentionally).
If the Ref does chooses to speak to the spectatator, make it
brief. Point out that their actions are inappropriate (especially
if this is a Minor's game) and to please refrain. The Ref is not
there to debate calls etc. with a spectator and you may wish to make
that clear to the spectator, again depending on how you perceive that
comment would be taken.
|
(04/01/2008) Question 358:
During a CUSA womens game that was getting a little emotional (just enough
to up the tempo with out injuries), the ball was rolling back to the goalie
with an attacker bearing down but it appeared to me that the goalie was
going to beat her. My attention then was either distracted to another
something
on the field (perhaps a sub request) or I just had already shifted
upfield anticipating the play. When I suddenly looked back to see the
attacker slide tackling to beat the goalie to the ball. The keeper did pick
it up (after the slide tackle had started) but took a tackle to the ankle
and went down. Naturally, the defending team was outraged. I viewed this as
a case of perhaps a bit of carelessness but the slide was made when the ball
was still 50-50 but made contact after it was scooped up. I confered with my
AR who confirmed they saw her sliding before it was picked up. THat is the
call I made and it was supported by the players/coaches after I explained. I
have always wondered to this day if perhaps another ref would have made a
different call. |
(04/01/2008) The Ref's Response:
I trust this was a CWSA game, not CUSA. Either way the Ref's reaction is the same.
Bottom line: Players
are responsible for their own actions.
From the
situation described, the attacker did not win the ball (or even make contact
with it) and kicked the keeper. As described, this is a foul.
It's unclear
is how severe the contact was:
- Severe enough to call? Caution? Dismiss? (ie. did the attacker slide in feet first or in a dangerous manner?)
- Trifling
enough to leave the ball in the keepers hands and play on?
- Perhaps with a
warning to the attacker to control her actions.
Starting
a slide does not absolve a player of the results of their actions. How late the CONTACT is made is one of the measures of how 'careless' or 'reckless' an action
is.
|
(03/25/2008) Question 357:
What are the rules in regards to screening or blocking the vision and
actions of a goalkeeper?
|
(03/26/2008) The Ref's Response:
There is no rule regarding 'screening a
keeper'. However there are sections in the Rules of Indoor Soccer
and the Laws of Outdoor Soccer regarding impeding and obstruction by a
player on an opponent. Impeding would be a player stepping into
the path of an opponent with minimal or no opportunity to safely
challenge for possession. Obstruction would be a player: stepping
into the path of an opponent with no intention of playing the ball
(Note: there is a fine line between 'Shielding the ball' and
obstruction); or intentionally waving an arm/hand in the opponent's
face. For example, the tactic of 'dummying the ball' is not
obstruction.
'Screening a Keeper' is a common tactic used in the Indoor Game,
because there is no offside. In the outdoor game the main
opportunity to 'Screen a Keeper' is on a Corner Kick. So the Ref
must determine if the attacking team player is 'Screening', or or is
the player guilty of Impeding and/or Obstruction. One indicator
may be did the player take a position and stay there, or did the player
move with the keeper, with no intention or opportunity to play the
ball, forcing the keeper to take a wider path. |
(03/19/2008) Question 356:
We recently played a tournament game which ran into a shoot-out. Our team won.
Two CMSA referees were on hand to witness the game. The opposing team accepted
the loss .... at the time. Then 3 days later, without discussing it with our
Coach, we were told to be at the field at a certain time (one hour prior to the
Gold game) as the Shoot-out was going to be \"Re-done\". This was absolutely
insane. And even more disappointing when our team lost the 2nd shoot-out. Can
you please explain how 2 CMSA Referees witness the shoot-out, call the win
(which didn\'t seem to be a problem at the time), put it in the books and 3 days
later they retract their decision? And why wasn\'t out Coach included in the
discussions that lead to the final decision to re-do the shoot-out? How does
this happen? |
(03/19/2008) The Ref's Response:
Without
a crystal ball, I could not even guess at the sequence of events that
resulted in this outcome. I suspect this was a League decission and I'm
not in a position to comment. I recommend your Coach and/or Team
Manager refer this question to an official with CMSA. |
(03/19/2008) Question 355:
...when can I get a 2nd pach for the upcomming 08 outdoor season (black/white
paches) |
(03/19/2008) The Ref's Response:
This
subject was briefly commented on at the CDSRA March 18th ART Class.
The 'UNOFFICIAL' word is there are currently enough crests/badges
to meet the demand for Refs Renewing and the anticipated number of new
Refs. Once ASA has filled this need (which I can guess would be
Mid June), Our Local ASA Rep will order sufficient stock.
|
(03/17/2008) Question 354:
During one of our indoor tournament games (U16 tier 4), an attacker was running
forwards toward the net to bring down a high ball and the keeper came out to
punch out the ball. There was a collision and the attacker went into the boards.
She ended up being down for around 20 minutes while we waited for an ambulance.
There was approximatly 21-22 minutes remaining when the injury occured, however
the clock continued to run until the 2 minute mark. We then had to play the last
two minutes of the game. My question is, is having only getting to play about
3-4 minutes of the second half, is this considered enough time for the game to
be considered legal, or could we have argued for a re-match because there was
not enough of the game played? |
(03/18/2008) The Ref's Response:
What
constitute as a game deemed played is up to the league supplementary
rules. Many leagues have different rules when it comes to this.
The CMSA League rules and most of their Tournament rules are 2/3rds of the game, indoor or outdoor, constitutes as a game played.
|
(03/12/2008) Question 353:
A team is setting up a free kick which is within scoring distance from the
goal. Two players are standing ready to take the kick. The first player runs
up to the ball, doesn't touch it, and runs over the top of the ball. The
second player is following close behind and takes the shot. Is this kind of
fake allowed? It is obviously a rehearsed set piece. |
(03/12/2008) The Ref's Response:
You're correct, it is a '...set piece'. You see this play at all
levels from Minors up to the Professional Leagues, both Indoor and
Outdoor. Rule13 states that "...the kicker shall have five
(5) seconds (indoor)to put the ball into
play.". Law 12 states that a player can be cautioned for
"...excessively delaying the taking of a throw-in or free kick.".
The 'kicker' can be anyone on the attacking team that was
awarded the free kick. There is no mention regarding the activity
of any of the kicker's teammates. |
(03/11/2008) Question 352:
I recently awarded a penalty for an infringement in the penalty area and
afterwards wondered if a red card should have been shown for denying a goal
scoring opportunity. An attacker broke through and ran towards the goal with a
defender on her left hand side keeping pace. As the attacker was about to shoot
with her right foot,from about the penalty spot, the two players bumped just
enough to put the attacker off balance and she was unable to get the shot
off. I saw this as the defender contacting the player before the ball, which
was on the far side of the attacker. The contact was not agressive, and may not
have been intentional, but it did prevent the shot. There was only the goalie
to beat. A red card would have been harsh but I wondered if a red card should
have been shown as it was a definite goal scoring opportunity. Do the rules
allow some latitude in a case like this. |
(03/12/2008) The Ref's Response:
My colleague and I had this discussion, and I oppologize if this gets long winded:
First - was
the balled carrier fouled, or was this simply a 'fair
challenge/charge'. If the defender "...was not aggressive" and
the intention was to make a play for the ball from the side (ie. not
from behind) and the ball carrier succesfully 'shielded' the ball that
resulted in the contact, then there is no foul and the penalty shot was
not even warrented.
Second - "The
contact was not aggressive...", but the Ref observed the defender
intentionally bumped the player with no intention of playing the ball
(ie. attempted to 'Charge' or 'Tackle' the ball carrier which is a
foul). When you mentioned "There was only the goalie to beat.", it
tells us
that it was a definite 'shot on goal' opportunity and a good chance at
a scoring opportunity, but it is not a OBVIOUS goal scoring
opportunity. Therefore only a penalty shot is awarded.
Third - The
defender was overly aggressive and had no intention of playing the ball
(ie. again attempted to 'Charge' or 'Tackle'), again it is not
a OBVIOUS goal scoring opportunity but the Ref may choose to show
a Blue Card. If the penalty shot is successful, the defender is
relieved. If not, the team plays short for two minutes.
Fourth - Similar
to the Second or Third statement, except the Keeper is out of position
and there is nothing between the ball carrier and the goal, there is
there is no question that the defender would be dismissed for Denying a
OBVIOUS Goal Scoring Opportunity for a PENAL OFFENCE (See
Rule/Law 12)
Lastly - If
the ball carrier had gotten ahead of the defender directly infront of
the goal, and the defender made an attempt to 'tackle' from behind,
again there is no question that the defender would be dismissed for
Denying a OBVIOUS Goal Scoring Opportunity for a PENAL
OFFENCE (See Rule/Law 12)
|
(03/10/2008) Question 351:
My question concerns cautions. When a team is a player short in an indoor game
for a player receiving a yellow card and they then recieve a subequent blue card
for a foul (so it is now a 5 on 3 situation); how long should be served by the
players in the penalty box? Is it 4 minutes for the yellow card and two for the
blue (unless goals are scored) from the time of the foul? We (the team) were informed that the second player (the player
you recieved the blue card when we were down a player due the
yellow but no goal had been conceded) had to go to the box and
that his time would not start until the first player (cautioned with a yellow) finished his penalty. |
(03/10/2008) The Ref's Response:
I'm not sure why the AR made this comment. Unless there are three
players from the same team in the box, the two Time Penalties are
served similtaneously, not consecutively. If a goal is scored
against the penalized team, then the person serving the Double Minor
would benefit first from the relief of the goal scored. |
(02/27/2008) Question 350:
I fully understand and support the zero tolerance of abuse towards our young
referees. I'm wondering if this abuse also applies to players by parents.
I recently walked back to the referee\'s changing room and witnessed a
father admonishing his daughter in an unbelievably loud voice for playing
poorly. This was in front of her team and other parents. I'm sure we were
all embarrassed for the little girl and uncomfortable with the situation.
Do you have any suggestions as to how a referee should handle, if at all,
this kind of situation. |
(03/06/2008) The Ref's Response:
This a very sensitive subject. The strict letter of the
Rules/Laws states the Ref has authority to enforce the Rules .... in
connection to the game. This includes the conduct of spectators.
But the reality is you need to be VERY sure you have read
the situation right - and that you have an idea how the parent
will react.
The second option you have is to say something to the coach, if you are
comfortable with discussing this subject with the coach. Again be
careful as you may be perceived as a concerned parent rather than a Ref.
The third option you have is to submit your concern to the league
and/or club. CMSA and most, if not all, clubs have a very strict
policy regarding the conduct of parents towards Refs, Coaches, Players,
and other spectators. I've seen parents banned from attending
games for such conduct.
If you are at all unsure how this discussion will be perceived, I'd
choose the third option. With any option you choose, also note it
on JUST PLAY. |
(03/02/2008) Question 349:
....why if you are hurt you need to stay down on the ground and not go to the bench.? |
(03/03/2008) The Ref's Response:
The player's 'need to stay down' is a signal to the Ref and/or AR that
they either requires assistance to get off the field of play, or
getting off under their own power would be slow which would place
themselves or other players at risk of further injury. The only
method to do either safely is to have the play stopped. |
(03/02/2008) Question 348:
In reference to Question 347: In outdoor does the team play a
player short for the second half? |
(03/03/2008) The Ref's Response:
If the term 'player' is the literal definition, then YES the team plays
short in the seoond half. If the Term 'player' is the general
definition, then it depends if the 'player' was a player on the field
of play or a substitute. If the 'player' is a substitute, the
team DOES NOT play short on the field, but does play with one less
substitute. |
(03/02/2008) Question 347:
If the referee red cards a player and dismisses him/her from the field during
half time is the 5 minute penalty still served. |
(03/03/2008) The Ref's Response:
If the Red card is for one of the 7 offences list in Rule 12, then the
team must serve the 5 minute major time penalty in the second half
(note: the team does not need to send a player to the box). If
the Red Card is for a second Yellow, then the team plays short for only
4 minute/Double Minor Misconduct. |
(03/01/2008) Question 346:
If I call a 3-line pass but then realise that i made a mistake how should play
be restarted? |
(03/02/2008) The Ref's Response:
The proper restart is a drop ball. You may
also request to the teams that fair play would be in order and the one
team kick the ball back to the other team's defence. |
(02/28/2008) Question 345:
I'm interested in your view as to how strict the laws should be applied in a
one sided game at the U10 or U12 level. I was AR for a GU12 game and at 5-0 had
stopped putting goals scored on the scoreboard. In the last few minutes of the
game a losing defender ran into the ball just outside the defensive line and
knocked it back to her keeper who picked it up. I made eye contact with the ref
and indicated a handball and while we both looked at each other neither of us
wanted to call it. Did we take a learning opportunity away from the teams or
can we show some compassion at this level when one side is well and truly
beaten? |
(03/02/2008) The Ref's Response:
You can show both compassion and present this as a
learning opportunity. Let the player, goal tender, and posibly
the coach know at the earliest opportunity you did not call the
hand ball, even though it was in violation of the Indoor Rules of
Soccer, in the interest of game management. And in any other
game, it would have been called. |
(02/27/2008) Question 344:
Now you've piqued my interest. In questions 340 & 312 I understand your
logic if the blue is upgraded to a yellow as the players go to the box. However
can a blue be upgraded to a yellow after the play has started? Surely the
dissent after play has started is a completely separate offence and it is too
late to upgrade the previous penalty which has already begun. |
(03/02/2008) The Ref's Response:
Your question has raised a few eyebrows.
The consensus I've received so far is the rules are not clear on this
situation as it is described. The Rules do state that if a
"...second offence...after the restart" is committed, the Yellow Card
is shown and the Time Penalty start when the 2 minute minor has expired
(ie. potentially the player is in the box for 6 mins). However the way
the question was submitted leaves doubt that this is NOT a "second
offence", it's still part of the first offence and the AR was just late in
calling the Ref over.
In the case of the latter, a correction in the restart. Teams are 6 on 5
until such time the 2 min misconduct has expired. Then at the next
stoppage, the one player is released, and the player that received the
Yellow card serves the remainder of the Double Minor.
Please note that this answer is still not official. Our senior Ref has
submitted this to ASA for their interpretation of the Rules. |
|
(02/27/2008) Question 343:
I would like to look into finding
out how to get registered to referee in Calgary. I was a level 3 back in Ontario. I have not
registered since 2005 because with moving here in October 2006 I didn't have the
time in the summer 2006 to referee since I traveling back and forth to find a
place to live. Any information would be a help.
|
(02/27/2008) The Ref's Response:
You'll need to register with ASA (Alberta Soccer Association), and then
contact the CSF (Calgary Soccer Federation) Ref Coordinator to get your name on
the Ref Manager Website. It's a bit late for the Indoor season, but the outdoor
season is only month and a half away. So once you are registered and have your
name on the Ref Manager Website, you can sign up for the outdoor refresher where
all other details will be explained.
|
(02/27/2008) Question 341:
Can you explain when to call a slide tackle in indoor. I've seen yellow cards
given for fairly innocent looking tackles and nothing given for agressive
looking tackles. I'm wondering if there are different rules for different
leagues e.g. CO-ED v CUSA?
|
(02/27/2008) The Ref's Response:
Yes, rules are different. The CO-ED league DOES NOT allow slide
tackles and players guilty of this offense are cautioned. This is
stated in the CO-ED 2007-08 Indoor Supplimental Regulations.
In all other leagues the player is NOT cautioned for a slide tackle. However in the judgement
of the Ref, the player may be cautioned for playing in a dangerous
manner. Some indicators may be, but not limited to: the
defender's feet/legs are NOT down low on the turf; the defender's
action plays the ball and the motion carries through to take out the
attacker as well (note: this is as opposed to the defender plays the
ball and then the attacker simply runs into/over the defender);
the attackers direction of play is towards the boards with no
time to recover, and to some extend the skill level of the teams. |
(02/27/2008) Question 340:
With regard to question 312 when player A time expires doesn\'t player B starts
serving his double minor and the goals scored and time expired are dealt in
accordance to a double minor rather than being allowed on the field when the
goal is scored?
|
(02/27/2008) The Ref's Response:
In Question 312, the Ref showed the BLUE card as a warning to both
players to 'cool down', before the situation esculates into a
cautionable or send off offence (ie. In outdoor, the players would be
just taken aside for a brief discussion). Player B did not heed
that warning and therefore Player B's BLUE card was upgraded to a
YELLOW, and the time penalty was also changed from 2 minuite to a
4 minute (aka 'double minor'). |
(02/26/2008) Question 339:
I refereed a mens over 30 indoor game and during the game there were alot
whistles blown for fouls and cards were given. After the game as myself and the
other ref stepped off the field one the players approached us and started to
verbally attack us. Are we as refs allowed to do anything after the game? |
(02/24/2008) The Ref's Response:
DEFINITELY!!! Rules of Indoor Soccer Rule # 5 states "Each match
is controlled by a referee who has full authority to enforce the Rules of
Indoor Soccer in connection with the match to which he has been appointed."
Logically you wouldn't show the player a card. But you can
note a card on the Game Sheet. If a RED card is warrented, you
can ask the Team Manager/Coach for the Player's card. If your
request is refused, note the Red Card on the game sheet and in the
comment section advise the league that the RED Card was given for
conduct after the game and the Team Manager/Coach refused to provide
the player's card, then let the league deal with it. |
(02/24/2008) Question 338:
When you have quilliefied to be a ref what do you get after the cource? |
(02/24/2008) The Ref's Response:
You should receive a letter from ASA (Alberta Soccer Association)
welcoming you and it should also contain a badge. If you'd like
to inquire regarding your qualifications, you can contact them Toll Free 1.866.250.2200.
|
(02/21/2008) Question 337:
Red #13 is attacking with Red #11 to his left. White defender #2 challenges red
#13 with a slide tackle just as ted #13 passes the ball to res #11. Red #13 is
brought down but the advantage was applied with a flying card. Red #11 scores
on the advantage and during the stoppage white #2 is cautioned for USB.
Does
white #2 serve the double minor or is the first 2 minutes eliminated by the
scoring of the goal? |
(02/21/2008) The Ref's Response:
In summary: White #2 is assessed a YELLOW card by the Ref;
because Red team has an advantage called, the Ref holds up a
'flying card' (ie. Blue) to see how the advantage plays out; the
advantage results in a goal scored and play is stopped; White #2 is
shown the YELLOW card which is be recorded (ie. if this player receives
a second YELLOW,
the player is dismissed, or depending on league regulations the
player
could receive game suspensions based on the number of YELLOW cards
received); accompanying the YELLOW card is 4 min time penalty which
consists two 2 minute consecutive time penalties, or commonly referred
to as a "Double Minor Misconduct" (Rule #12 2007/2008 Rules of Indoor
Soccer); the first 2 minutes of the Time Penalty is forgiven
because a goal was scored against the White Team; White #2 has 2
minutes left to serve on the Time Penalty in the box.
|
(02/19/2008) Question 336:
At a the tournament this past weekend, the referee allowed several direct hits
on the goalie with no verbal discussion or penalties applied to the offender.
In one instance the goalie was hurt and required medical attention. Can you
please clarify the rule(s) on this situation. |
(02/19/2008) The Ref's Response:
The Rules/Laws of the Game regarding "direct" contact are the same for
any player on the field. If the direct contact is reckless,
and/or shows intention to play the
opponent and not the ball, then it is a foul or a cautionable offence.
However because the Keeper is often more vunerable to injury from a
direct contact, Ref's in general will call this action a bit tighter
than they would for a player to player contact. |
(02/19/2008) Question 335:
At a recent men's game an attacker broke clear and was running with the ball
directly towards the opponent's goal. The goalkeeper came running off the
line, dropped low, very agressively and deliberately slid into the attacker's
feet, and took out the ball and the attacker resulting in a crunching collision.
This occurred outside the penalty area. Both players were hurt and the game
was stopped for several minutes. The well respected referee dropped the ball to
restart the game while I was expecting a red card to the goalkeeper for sfp.
Please help me understand how two referees can see an incident so differently. |
(02/19/2008) The Ref's Response:
Without being there to see the event, or having a video to watch, this
is difficult to give a yes or no answer to. However I will take
the description literally.
First there are two (2) refs on the field: the Ref in the middle and
the AR. If the AR saw something, that Ref can call over the Ref
in the middle to discuss. The final decision though is with the
Ref in the middle.
Secondly the keeper "...slid into the attacker's feet, and took out the
ball...". For the Keeper defending a breakaway, that is the best
defence provided the keeper slid into the attacker with both feet down
and the soles/legs not directed at the attacking player to block the
travel of the ball. In this case the attacker also has the
obligation to avoid a "crunching" collision. If the keeper
delibrately did more than just try to take out the ball, ie. coming in
hard and reckless enough or soles/legs directed straight at the
attacking player's feet or legs to take out the attacking player, and
the attacking player had no chance to avoid a "crunching" collision,
then a card may be warrented.
So the description of the event would conclude that NO FOUL was
committed and the stoppage was the result of injury. I suspect
the Ref though explained to both players to remind them that both have
to be able to work at their day job the next day. |
(02/19/2008) Question 334:
At a kick off a player from the team kicking off ran forwards over the centre
line, after I blew the whistle but before the ball was kicked, and played the
ball. I stopped play, gave the player a verbal warning and restarted with
another kick off. Should I have shown a blue card straight away and was the
restart correct? |
(02/19/2008) The Ref's Response:
At the beginning of the half or after a goal, this is the correct restart.
In general, the player that crossed the line usually has done so in
error by mis-timing the touch by the teammate and you are correct to
'educate' the player on the proper restart procedure. If you do
so in a manner both teams understand why, which is usually quite
evendent, the second time this happens you can assess if the player is
intentionally trying to delay the restart and show a card. |
(02/19/2008) Question 333:
Do the rules say anything about an attacking player moving backwards and
forwards in front of a goalkeeper just prior to a free kick being taken just
outside the penalty area. The defending teams coaches were claiming such
movement is not allowed. The attacking player was obviously trying to distract
the keeper and succeeded as a goal was scored with the keeper unable to see the
ball. There was no contact between the players. What parameters does a referee
use to judge if an offence has been committed? |
(02/19/2008) The Ref's Response:
Commonly referred to as 'Screening the Keeper', this is part of the
game. However there are limits, and it is the judgement of the
Ref to determine if the attacker(s) is simply 'screening' or trying to
gain an unfair advantage. Some 'parameters' that the Ref may use,
but not limited to, is: the attacker is waving his/her arms and/or
hands to create a distraction; the attacker is facing the keeper as
opposed to the play; the attacker's movements are impeding the keeper's
and/or defender's movements; using certain spoken words to
distract the keeper and/or defender; to name a few. |
(02/11/15) Question 332:
I have now refereed a number of adult games and it appears widespread that
players and coaches seem to think it is not a foul as long as the ball is played
first even if the tackler follows through and makes significant contact with the
player in possession. I have called a number of fouls where the player in
possession has been bruised, knocked over or even injured. These calls get
howls of protest from the offending team and often leads to further discipline.
Is there some way we can clarify this rule with coaches and players so that
this point of contention can be removed from the game.
|
(02/11/15) The Ref's Response:
There will always be coaches and players who are unaware of the Rules/Laws of the game. Not sure
that is changing any time soon. You'll see this right through to the professional leagues.
It then comes down to the 'Man Management' part of the Ref's job.
If you explain to the coach/player that, in your best judgement,
excessive force was used in the tackle which is listed as a 'Foul' and
in the extreme case a Cautionable offence. Some will accept that
explanation, some will argue. But in the end it's the Ref's
decision that counts. For those that don't, I say to them that if
they are firm in their belief that they can pass along their comments
on the Ref evaluation form.
Also remember the Players/Coaches view point. As Refs we all have
our level of tolerance, and that is not necessarily uniform throughout.
As part of your 'Man Management' you need to have them understand
YOUR level of tolerance, which is usually indicated by YOUR consistant
calls.
|
(02/11/15) Question 331:
I sometimes have not been able to find my games in the Just Play list. I'm
suspecting that if one official fills in the Just Play form then it is taken off
the list. Should only the R fill this form in; even though there is also input
from the AR? If I fill in this form as the AR do I then prevent the R from also
sending in his comments? |
(02/11/15) The Ref's Response:
I too have encountered games on the Just Play site that are not listed.
But the explanation I received from the league was because the
information was not provided, or not provided with the correct info
(ie. wrong date, etc.) to the Just Play Administrators.
The games that are uploaded properly are visable. The only thing
that is affected by your colleague entering info first is that the
winner and the position are already selected. The stats you input
are associated with your login.
If a particular game is missing and you'd like to enter the stats,
please contact the League and advise them of the missing game. |
(02/11/2008) Question 330:
This is a follow up to question 321 regarding players wearing different colour
socks on each leg. I am also bothered by this as I interpret it as an
unsporting ploy to distract the other team.
The CUSA Discipline Code book, on page 19, defines uniforms as a
distinctive set of clothes for all team players consisting of a jersey, shorts
and socks of uniform colour and design.
Does this definition not imply socks are to be the same colour?
|
(02/13/2008) The Ref's Response:
The term "...uniform color and design" refers to the team, not the
player. The response in question 321: "The
uniform must be same for all players, with the exception of the
Keeper." implies that if all players are wearing a different colour
sock on each foot, the TEAM SOCKS are "...of uniform colour and design"
provided they are all wearing the same coloured sock on each respective
foot. If some players are wearing the same coloured socks, or a
colour other than those worn by their team mates, then they NOT of
uniform colour and design.
|
(02/11/2008) Question 329:
In the AR's box in indoor soccer there is a telephone to call for security if
the officials have to deal with unruly spectators. Do the soccer centres
actually have security personnel available or does this line go to the staff at
the front reception desk. I am asking this as the staff are often young people
and it may not be reasonable to ask them to deal with an ugly
situation. Spectators causing a problem are often emotional upset and
exhibiting unacceptable behaviour. |
(02/13/2008) The Ref's Response:
I referred this question to the General Manager of the Calgary Soccer Center:
"The writer is correct. It goes to the front kiosk for our Building
attendants. They are not security. If there is an unruly fan/player that appears
to be a threat then you would then ask BA's to call police. My staff IS NOT
THERE to act as bouncers."
The key word in his reply is "THREAT". The Ref will discuss this
with the CSC Staff. If they are not willing to take on this task,
the next persons I would go to is the coaches and advise that the game
is stopped until such time the spectator is removed from the building.
Most coaches will know who the spectator is and take action
before the Ref is forced to abandon the game. Then failing that,
the last resort is for the BA's to call the police.
|
(02/11/2008) Question 328:
IF A PLAYER IS SUBED AND THE PLAYER WHO COMES IS NOT ON THE REFS LIST CAN THE
SUBED PLAYER COME BACK ON ? |
(02/13/2008) The Ref's Response:
In theory, this should never happen. The Ref can not knowingly
allow the person to come on the field if that person's name is not on
the team list for the game.
But in the event a mistake is made, not only can the player come back
on, the player MUST come back on because the substitution was never
made. In order for the substitution to be complete, both names
must be on the Team list for the game. |
(02/05/2008) Question 327:
Feb. 3 we had our game at the Southeast Soccer center. We belong to the
competitive U12A. In the game the opponent coach became the Assistant Ref. with
out our consultation. Is this right? Especially when so many calls coming from
him were against our team. Is this fair play? |
(02/02/06) The Ref's Response:
It is recommended that Ref discuss 'game control' with the assistant
before the first Kickoff. If the assigned Ref does not show, then
the Ref has to decide if he/she will do both roles, or ask for a
Parent/Coach volunteer. Ref's are encouraged to
discuss 'game control' with both Team Managers so both team
players and coaches understand how challenging this situation is and
the Ref will do the best he/she can.
'Fair Play' is subjective. The Ref has the authority to
agree or disagree with the AR's call, whether the AR is a Ref or a
Parent/Coach Volunteer. The Coach may have made the call, but it
was the Ref that had to take the appropriate action. I suspect
the Ref in this case was new and may not have experienced this
situation until now.
Either way, I encourage you to go to the CMSA web site, place the
cursor over "Club and Team Official's Area" and select Referee
Evaluation. Please don't look at this as a method of critizing a
Ref, but a method for CSF to help the this Ref and others to become a
better referees. |
(02/02/2008) Question 326:
On the NW soccer centre fields I have seen corners taken from both the round
spot close in to the goal and also from where two lines meet with a small dashed
arc further away from the goal. Please confirm where the corners should be
taken from. |
(02/02/2008) The Ref's Response:
Both are locations for a corner kick. The 'Round Spot' is the
location for the "Boarded" game, and where the end line and side line
meet is the location for the "Boardless" game. This is the case
for both the NW soccer center or the East soccer center. |
(02/02/2008) Question 325:
During a GU14 CMSA game the referee counted down 5 seconds for a free kick and
when it was still not taken then awarded the kick to the other side. I thought
this was supposed to be a blue card for a delay of game, a two minute penalty,
and the kick is retained by the penalized team. Are there special rules for
CMSA. Can you please clarify? |
(02/02/2008) The Ref's Response:
By Rule number 8, ASA Indoor Rules of Soccer, your understanding is correct:
On any start or restart, the team entitled to the kick has five (5)
seconds to play the ball.
In the event of taking more
than five (5) seconds, the kicker is penalized by a two (2) minute minor
misconduct penalty for delaying the restart. However, that team remains
entitled to the restart
The
ref may have had this confused with the Laws of the Outdoor Game (if a
Keeper delays the restart by more than 6 seconds, an indirect kick is
awarded to the opposing team). |
(01/31/2008) Question 324:
How far across the goal line does the ball have to go (indoor soccer) in order
to be counted as a goal? |
|
(02/01/2008) The Ref's Response
The "Rules of Indoor" and the 'Laws of Outdoor' state the same
explanation:
RULE 10 – The Method of Scoring
Goal
Scored
A goal is
scored when the whole of the ball passes over the goal line, between the
goalposts and under the crossbar, provided that no infringement of the Rules of
Indoor Soccer has been committed previously by the team scoring the
goal.
It is not a case of '...how far'. If 100% of the ball has crossed the back
side of the goal line, it is a goal. The major difference in the Indoor game is
that there is no AR in line of sight with the goal line. Therefore it falls on
the Ref to judge "Did 100% of the ball cross the line?". If the Ref has any
doubt, then the Ref should signal NO GOAL.
|
(01/31/2008) Question 323:
Following an attack an attacking player runs across the goal line and is off the
field. The goalie has possession of the ball in his hands, and unaware there is
an attacker off the field behind him, drops the ball at his feet. The attacker
runs back onto the field, collects the ball and kicks it into the goal. Is this
a goal or should the goal be disallowed and the player cautioned for USB, either
entering the field without the ref\'s permission or leaving the field to gain a
tactical advantage. An example of this is on youtube and the attacker is
celebrating. However it does not show the restart so the ref\'s decision is not
known. |
(01/31/2008) The Ref's Response:
This one is actually pretty famous. That clip made the youtube rounds a
couple of times. The answer is: Goal, restart with kickoff. The attacker left
the field of play as a normal part of play. This is analogous to running off
the field to get around a defender. There is no problem with doing it. Also,
if you have left the field in this manner you are implicitly judged to have
permission to re-enter the field. There is definitely nothing unsporting about
it. The goalkeeper should know better.
|
(01/22/2008) Question 322:
I have just finished the indoor conversion course ... I
understand, I have to shadow/sit-in on two games before I can ref and I
must have a for for the referee to fill out. Where can I get the
form and once I have completed the sit-in sessions, who do I contact in
regards to scheduling? |
(01/22/2008) The Ref's Response:
Forms for shadowing are supposed to be in the referee rooms at either soccer
centre. If not, you can write down the game details on a piece of paper along with your name
and have the referee sign it when you are finished sitting in for both games.
Leave it in the ref room with the gamesheets.
To be scheduled you must submit an availability form through the referee
manager by the 10th of every month if you want to be assigned games for the
following month.
|
(01/21/2008) Question 321:
I've seen a couple of instances where the individual players wear a different
colour socks on each leg. As a referee I find this very distracting and I'm
sure the opposition does also. Is there anything in the rules to say both socks
must be the same colour. As a ref am I within my rights to ask the players to
change their socks. The last time I saw this the players had one red and one
white sock. At the very least they could switch socks so that each player had
either both white or both red; perhaps a compromise to at least let the game go
ahead. |
(01/22/2008) The Ref's Response:
I can see nothing in the Rules and/or Laws of the game that
would prohibit a team from doing this. The only item is that
the Jersey, Shorts, and Socks should be distingtive from
the opposing team, Referee, and the Assistant Referee. The
uniform must be same for all players, with the exception of the Keeper. |
(01/16/2008) Question 320:
I have a daughter that is thinking about taking a refereeing course and she
would like to know how much you get paid per game in the outdoor season, what do
you get paid? |
(01/16/2008 The Ref's Response:
The fees are published on the Calgary Soccer Federation Referee Website |
(01/12/2008) Question 319:
while fighting in the corners, is there any time limit or restrictions other
than the basic calls a ref would normally be required to make? |
(01/12/2008) The Ref's Response:
If two Players are 'fighting' anywhere on the pitch, the play is stopped.
However I'm going to boldly assume the term "fighting" is an
opponents challenging for possession of the ball '...in the corner.
There is no specific statement in the Rules of Indoor Soccer
regarding a 'Time Limit'.
There are restrictions under Rule 12. If the Player in possession
of the ball is fouled but maintains possession, the Ref may allow
the play to continue. If the Ref sees no advantage gained by
allowing the play to continue, a free kick can be awarded. The
Ref may also call out an instruction to both players to let them know
the foul was seen and to be careful, just to let both players know they
are being watched.
This holds true for anywhere on the field of play. If the game is
flowing well, Ref's will wait a few seconds to see what transpires
before blowing the whistle. If tensions are high, the Ref may
blow the whistle immediately so that calmer heads can prevail. |
(01/07/2008) Question 318:
During the course of the game one team received 3 bench minors. These minors
were served by player A, who had been injured. With the third "blue" for the
bench would player A be yellow carded? |
(01/08/2008) The Ref's Response:
Rule 12 states "A player
is cautioned ....is
assessed a 3rd minor misconduct time penalty".
"Player A" wasn't shown any "Blue Cards", the bench was shown the
Blue Card. So Player A could not be Yellow Carded. However the
Bench can be Yellow Carded and this should be noted on the Game Sheet.
I suspect the league would be in contact with the coach.
(04/16/2008) Question 361:
...on a delayed blue card and i know not recomended but delayed yellow card, if the
team that was victim of the foul scores do they still get the powerplay? |
(04/13/2008) The Ref's Response:
If the Ref decides to indicate a delayed penalty, then the Ref must see an
advantage to the attacking team that should be played out. If the advantage
results in a goal scored, then the time assessed for the card would be in
accordance to the Rules of Indoor Soccer. So then the following time assess would result:
- If there is a player already in the box serving a Minor or
Double-Minor and the team is playing short, their current 2 minute time
would be relived.
- If the delayed penalty is for a Red Card offense, and the play can go on, then the team is serving a 5 minute with no relief.
- If the box is empty, then the offending player is relived of the first 2 minutes.
It may be wise to note your decission on the game sheet |
(04/12/2008) Question 360:
if a fan doesnt want to leave the field what does the referee do ?? |
(04/13/2008) The Ref's Response:
The conduct of the spectators are the TEAMS responsibility, not yours.
Assuming your actions described in Question 359 do not produce a
positive result, you make it clear to both coaches (ie. I suspect even
though you may think you know the team responsibly, you need to be
sure), preferably in a loud enough voice that the spectators hear as
well, that the game will not be restarted until the particular
spectator has left the park. In the very unlikely event neither
coach takes action, after the appropriate waiting period the game is
abandoned.
After the game is complete, it is important to submit a Misconduct Form
with your game report. If you are a member of the CDSRA, this was
near the top of the list from our Presisdent and the Referees Affairs
Committee.
|
(04/12/2008) Question 359:
if the fan started to swear at you do you go and kick them out or do you talk to
there coach?? |
(04/13/2008) The Ref's Response:
Quite often the spectators are not on the same side of the field as the
team. So talking to the coach is an option, and I'd say a good
one if the team is on the same side as the spectators, but may not be
as affective as the Ref talking to the spectator. However the Ref
should anticipate the reaction of the spectator (ie. is he/she just
caught up in the moment, or are they acting this way intentionally).
If the Ref does chooses to speak to the spectatator, make it
brief. Point out that their actions are inappropriate (especially
if this is a Minor's game) and to please refrain. The Ref is not
there to debate calls etc. with a spectator and you may wish to make
that clear to the spectator, again depending on how you perceive that
comment would be taken.
|
(04/01/2008) Question 358:
During a CUSA womens game that was getting a little emotional (just enough
to up the tempo with out injuries), the ball was rolling back to the goalie
with an attacker bearing down but it appeared to me that the goalie was
going to beat her. My attention then was either distracted to another
something
on the field (perhaps a sub request) or I just had already shifted
upfield anticipating the play. When I suddenly looked back to see the
attacker slide tackling to beat the goalie to the ball. The keeper did pick
it up (after the slide tackle had started) but took a tackle to the ankle
and went down. Naturally, the defending team was outraged. I viewed this as
a case of perhaps a bit of carelessness but the slide was made when the ball
was still 50-50 but made contact after it was scooped up. I confered with my
AR who confirmed they saw her sliding before it was picked up. THat is the
call I made and it was supported by the players/coaches after I explained. I
have always wondered to this day if perhaps another ref would have made a
different call. |
(04/01/2008) The Ref's Response:
I trust this was a CWSA game, not CUSA. Either way the Ref's reaction is the same.
Bottom line: Players
are responsible for their own actions.
From the
situation described, the attacker did not win the ball (or even make contact
with it) and kicked the keeper. As described, this is a foul.
It's unclear
is how severe the contact was:
- Severe enough to call? Caution? Dismiss? (ie. did the attacker slide in feet first or in a dangerous manner?)
- Trifling
enough to leave the ball in the keepers hands and play on?
- Perhaps with a
warning to the attacker to control her actions.
Starting
a slide does not absolve a player of the results of their actions. How late the CONTACT is made is one of the measures of how 'careless' or 'reckless' an action
is.
|
(03/25/2008) Question 357:
What are the rules in regards to screening or blocking the vision and
actions of a goalkeeper?
|
(03/26/2008) The Ref's Response:
There is no rule regarding 'screening a
keeper'. However there are sections in the Rules of Indoor Soccer
and the Laws of Outdoor Soccer regarding impeding and obstruction by a
player on an opponent. Impeding would be a player stepping into
the path of an opponent with minimal or no opportunity to safely
challenge for possession. Obstruction would be a player: stepping
into the path of an opponent with no intention of playing the ball
(Note: there is a fine line between 'Shielding the ball' and
obstruction); or intentionally waving an arm/hand in the opponent's
face. For example, the tactic of 'dummying the ball' is not
obstruction.
'Screening a Keeper' is a common tactic used in the Indoor Game,
because there is no offside. In the outdoor game the main
opportunity to 'Screen a Keeper' is on a Corner Kick. So the Ref
must determine if the attacking team player is 'Screening', or or is
the player guilty of Impeding and/or Obstruction. One indicator
may be did the player take a position and stay there, or did the player
move with the keeper, with no intention or opportunity to play the
ball, forcing the keeper to take a wider path. |
(03/19/2008) Question 356:
We recently played a tournament game which ran into a shoot-out. Our team won.
Two CMSA referees were on hand to witness the game. The opposing team accepted
the loss .... at the time. Then 3 days later, without discussing it with our
Coach, we were told to be at the field at a certain time (one hour prior to the
Gold game) as the Shoot-out was going to be \"Re-done\". This was absolutely
insane. And even more disappointing when our team lost the 2nd shoot-out. Can
you please explain how 2 CMSA Referees witness the shoot-out, call the win
(which didn\'t seem to be a problem at the time), put it in the books and 3 days
later they retract their decision? And why wasn\'t out Coach included in the
discussions that lead to the final decision to re-do the shoot-out? How does
this happen? |
(03/19/2008) The Ref's Response:
Without
a crystal ball, I could not even guess at the sequence of events that
resulted in this outcome. I suspect this was a League decission and I'm
not in a position to comment. I recommend your Coach and/or Team
Manager refer this question to an official with CMSA. |
(03/19/2008) Question 355:
...when can I get a 2nd pach for the upcomming 08 outdoor season (black/white
paches) |
(03/19/2008) The Ref's Response:
This
subject was briefly commented on at the CDSRA March 18th ART Class.
The 'UNOFFICIAL' word is there are currently enough crests/badges
to meet the demand for Refs Renewing and the anticipated number of new
Refs. Once ASA has filled this need (which I can guess would be
Mid June), Our Local ASA Rep will order sufficient stock.
|
(03/17/2008) Question 354:
During one of our indoor tournament games (U16 tier 4), an attacker was running
forwards toward the net to bring down a high ball and the keeper came out to
punch out the ball. There was a collision and the attacker went into the boards.
She ended up being down for around 20 minutes while we waited for an ambulance.
There was approximatly 21-22 minutes remaining when the injury occured, however
the clock continued to run until the 2 minute mark. We then had to play the last
two minutes of the game. My question is, is having only getting to play about
3-4 minutes of the second half, is this considered enough time for the game to
be considered legal, or could we have argued for a re-match because there was
not enough of the game played? |
(03/18/2008) The Ref's Response:
What
constitute as a game deemed played is up to the league supplementary
rules. Many leagues have different rules when it comes to this.
The CMSA League rules and most of their Tournament rules are 2/3rds of the game, indoor or outdoor, constitutes as a game played.
|
(03/12/2008) Question 353:
A team is setting up a free kick which is within scoring distance from the
goal. Two players are standing ready to take the kick. The first player runs
up to the ball, doesn't touch it, and runs over the top of the ball. The
second player is following close behind and takes the shot. Is this kind of
fake allowed? It is obviously a rehearsed set piece. |
(03/12/2008) The Ref's Response:
You're correct, it is a '...set piece'. You see this play at all
levels from Minors up to the Professional Leagues, both Indoor and
Outdoor. Rule13 states that "...the kicker shall have five
(5) seconds (indoor)to put the ball into
play.". Law 12 states that a player can be cautioned for
"...excessively delaying the taking of a throw-in or free kick.".
The 'kicker' can be anyone on the attacking team that was
awarded the free kick. There is no mention regarding the activity
of any of the kicker's teammates. |
(03/11/2008) Question 352:
I recently awarded a penalty for an infringement in the penalty area and
afterwards wondered if a red card should have been shown for denying a goal
scoring opportunity. An attacker broke through and ran towards the goal with a
defender on her left hand side keeping pace. As the attacker was about to shoot
with her right foot,from about the penalty spot, the two players bumped just
enough to put the attacker off balance and she was unable to get the shot
off. I saw this as the defender contacting the player before the ball, which
was on the far side of the attacker. The contact was not agressive, and may not
have been intentional, but it did prevent the shot. There was only the goalie
to beat. A red card would have been harsh but I wondered if a red card should
have been shown as it was a definite goal scoring opportunity. Do the rules
allow some latitude in a case like this. |
(03/12/2008) The Ref's Response:
My colleague and I had this discussion, and I oppologize if this gets long winded:
First - was
the balled carrier fouled, or was this simply a 'fair
challenge/charge'. If the defender "...was not aggressive" and
the intention was to make a play for the ball from the side (ie. not
from behind) and the ball carrier succesfully 'shielded' the ball that
resulted in the contact, then there is no foul and the penalty shot was
not even warrented.
Second - "The
contact was not aggressive...", but the Ref observed the defender
intentionally bumped the player with no intention of playing the ball
(ie. attempted to 'Charge' or 'Tackle' the ball carrier which is a
foul). When you mentioned "There was only the goalie to beat.", it
tells us
that it was a definite 'shot on goal' opportunity and a good chance at
a scoring opportunity, but it is not a OBVIOUS goal scoring
opportunity. Therefore only a penalty shot is awarded.
Third - The
defender was overly aggressive and had no intention of playing the ball
(ie. again attempted to 'Charge' or 'Tackle'), again it is not
a OBVIOUS goal scoring opportunity but the Ref may choose to show
a Blue Card. If the penalty shot is successful, the defender is
relieved. If not, the team plays short for two minutes.
Fourth - Similar
to the Second or Third statement, except the Keeper is out of position
and there is nothing between the ball carrier and the goal, there is
there is no question that the defender would be dismissed for Denying a
OBVIOUS Goal Scoring Opportunity for a PENAL OFFENCE (See
Rule/Law 12)
Lastly - If
the ball carrier had gotten ahead of the defender directly infront of
the goal, and the defender made an attempt to 'tackle' from behind,
again there is no question that the defender would be dismissed for
Denying a OBVIOUS Goal Scoring Opportunity for a PENAL
OFFENCE (See Rule/Law 12)
|
(03/10/2008) Question 351:
My question concerns cautions. When a team is a player short in an indoor game
for a player receiving a yellow card and they then recieve a subequent blue card
for a foul (so it is now a 5 on 3 situation); how long should be served by the
players in the penalty box? Is it 4 minutes for the yellow card and two for the
blue (unless goals are scored) from the time of the foul? We (the team) were informed that the second player (the player
you recieved the blue card when we were down a player due the
yellow but no goal had been conceded) had to go to the box and
that his time would not start until the first player (cautioned with a yellow) finished his penalty. |
(03/10/2008) The Ref's Response:
I'm not sure why the AR made this comment. Unless there are three
players from the same team in the box, the two Time Penalties are
served similtaneously, not consecutively. If a goal is scored
against the penalized team, then the person serving the Double Minor
would benefit first from the relief of the goal scored. |
(02/27/2008) Question 350:
I fully understand and support the zero tolerance of abuse towards our young
referees. I'm wondering if this abuse also applies to players by parents.
I recently walked back to the referee\'s changing room and witnessed a
father admonishing his daughter in an unbelievably loud voice for playing
poorly. This was in front of her team and other parents. I'm sure we were
all embarrassed for the little girl and uncomfortable with the situation.
Do you have any suggestions as to how a referee should handle, if at all,
this kind of situation. |
(03/06/2008) The Ref's Response:
This a very sensitive subject. The strict letter of the
Rules/Laws states the Ref has authority to enforce the Rules .... in
connection to the game. This includes the conduct of spectators.
But the reality is you need to be VERY sure you have read
the situation right - and that you have an idea how the parent
will react.
The second option you have is to say something to the coach, if you are
comfortable with discussing this subject with the coach. Again be
careful as you may be perceived as a concerned parent rather than a Ref.
The third option you have is to submit your concern to the league
and/or club. CMSA and most, if not all, clubs have a very strict
policy regarding the conduct of parents towards Refs, Coaches, Players,
and other spectators. I've seen parents banned from attending
games for such conduct.
If you are at all unsure how this discussion will be perceived, I'd
choose the third option. With any option you choose, also note it
on JUST PLAY. |
(03/02/2008) Question 349:
....why if you are hurt you need to stay down on the ground and not go to the bench.? |
(03/03/2008) The Ref's Response:
The player's 'need to stay down' is a signal to the Ref and/or AR that
they either requires assistance to get off the field of play, or
getting off under their own power would be slow which would place
themselves or other players at risk of further injury. The only
method to do either safely is to have the play stopped. |
(03/02/2008) Question 348:
In reference to Question 347: In outdoor does the team play a
player short for the second half? |
(03/03/2008) The Ref's Response:
If the term 'player' is the literal definition, then YES the team plays
short in the seoond half. If the Term 'player' is the general
definition, then it depends if the 'player' was a player on the field
of play or a substitute. If the 'player' is a substitute, the
team DOES NOT play short on the field, but does play with one less
substitute. |
(03/02/2008) Question 347:
If the referee red cards a player and dismisses him/her from the field during
half time is the 5 minute penalty still served. |
(03/03/2008) The Ref's Response:
If the Red card is for one of the 7 offences list in Rule 12, then the
team must serve the 5 minute major time penalty in the second half
(note: the team does not need to send a player to the box). If
the Red Card is for a second Yellow, then the team plays short for only
4 minute/Double Minor Misconduct. |
(03/01/2008) Question 346:
If I call a 3-line pass but then realise that i made a mistake how should play
be restarted? |
(03/02/2008) The Ref's Response:
The proper restart is a drop ball. You may
also request to the teams that fair play would be in order and the one
team kick the ball back to the other team's defence. |
(02/28/2008) Question 345:
I'm interested in your view as to how strict the laws should be applied in a
one sided game at the U10 or U12 level. I was AR for a GU12 game and at 5-0 had
stopped putting goals scored on the scoreboard. In the last few minutes of the
game a losing defender ran into the ball just outside the defensive line and
knocked it back to her keeper who picked it up. I made eye contact with the ref
and indicated a handball and while we both looked at each other neither of us
wanted to call it. Did we take a learning opportunity away from the teams or
can we show some compassion at this level when one side is well and truly
beaten? |
(03/02/2008) The Ref's Response:
You can show both compassion and present this as a
learning opportunity. Let the player, goal tender, and posibly
the coach know at the earliest opportunity you did not call the
hand ball, even though it was in violation of the Indoor Rules of
Soccer, in the interest of game management. And in any other
game, it would have been called. |
(02/27/2008) Question 344:
Now you've piqued my interest. In questions 340 & 312 I understand your
logic if the blue is upgraded to a yellow as the players go to the box. However
can a blue be upgraded to a yellow after the play has started? Surely the
dissent after play has started is a completely separate offence and it is too
late to upgrade the previous penalty which has already begun. |
(03/02/2008) The Ref's Response:
Your question has raised a few eyebrows.
The consensus I've received so far is the rules are not clear on this
situation as it is described. The Rules do state that if a
"...second offence...after the restart" is committed, the Yellow Card
is shown and the Time Penalty start when the 2 minute minor has expired
(ie. potentially the player is in the box for 6 mins). However the way
the question was submitted leaves doubt that this is NOT a "second
offence", it's still part of the first offence and the AR was just late in
calling the Ref over.
In the case of the latter, a correction in the restart. Teams are 6 on 5
until such time the 2 min misconduct has expired. Then at the next
stoppage, the one player is released, and the player that received the
Yellow card serves the remainder of the Double Minor.
Please note that this answer is still not official. Our senior Ref has
submitted this to ASA for their interpretation of the Rules. |
|
(02/27/2008) Question 343:
I would like to look into finding
out how to get registered to referee in Calgary. I was a level 3 back in Ontario. I have not
registered since 2005 because with moving here in October 2006 I didn't have the
time in the summer 2006 to referee since I traveling back and forth to find a
place to live. Any information would be a help.
|
(02/27/2008) The Ref's Response:
You'll need to register with ASA (Alberta Soccer Association), and then
contact the CSF (Calgary Soccer Federation) Ref Coordinator to get your name on
the Ref Manager Website. It's a bit late for the Indoor season, but the outdoor
season is only month and a half away. So once you are registered and have your
name on the Ref Manager Website, you can sign up for the outdoor refresher where
all other details will be explained.
|
(02/27/2008) Question 341:
Can you explain when to call a slide tackle in indoor. I've seen yellow cards
given for fairly innocent looking tackles and nothing given for agressive
looking tackles. I'm wondering if there are different rules for different
leagues e.g. CO-ED v CUSA?
|
(02/27/2008) The Ref's Response:
Yes, rules are different. The CO-ED league DOES NOT allow slide
tackles and players guilty of this offense are cautioned. This is
stated in the CO-ED 2007-08 Indoor Supplimental Regulations.
In all other leagues the player is NOT cautioned for a slide tackle. However in the judgement
of the Ref, the player may be cautioned for playing in a dangerous
manner. Some indicators may be, but not limited to: the
defender's feet/legs are NOT down low on the turf; the defender's
action plays the ball and the motion carries through to take out the
attacker as well (note: this is as opposed to the defender plays the
ball and then the attacker simply runs into/over the defender);
the attackers direction of play is towards the boards with no
time to recover, and to some extend the skill level of the teams. |
| (02/27/2008) | | |